(FACT: It's not just because some of us have crappy vision.)
I know some of you like the effect, but here's the deal: do whatever you want on your own monitor and keep your hands off mine.
Did you know that, in Windows, holding Ctrl and moving the scroll wheel up or down changes font size? You do now, and it's not much harder to change zoom size on a Mac (I hear it is most likely cmd++ or cmd+- , cmd+0 reverts it to the original size). I know it's just as easy in Linux, anyway.
I already have my browser's text size display set to what I want, thank you very much.
Anyone who uses Word must be familiar with the concept of font size in points: 12pt Times New Roman, especially, when it comes to turning in essays for teachers. (And 13pt periods for those of you who couldn't hit that minimum page count )
Well, here's the deal: Web display doesn't work quite the same way. You can force all text to be 16pt (which is pretty big) on your own website, but in general the standard is based around em, where 1em is the default size for whatever font you're using. I mention this because it's kind of a nice conceptual thing: smart web designers use em to determine sizes for things like header text, etc. The user is still the person in charge, as far as their browser goes.
1em is not a fixed value.
In my browser, 1em is probably 12pts. In yours, it might be something different (although I do mostly use the default setting, so there's a good chance it's the same).
Here's the thing: my screen is a 27" monitor with a resolution of 1920px (width) by 1080px (height).
To illustrate my point, I took the values from this approximate conversion and then plugged in the size of my monitor. For me, a single 12pt letter is something like 0.208" or 5.29mm wide.
If I had a larger monitor (someday...) or a lower resolution, it'd be bigger; if I had a smaller monitor or a higher resolution (which is currently impossible, except maybe on some Apple products), it'd be even smaller. For the record, 27" is bigger than the average desktop screen these days. People are more likely to have a 24" monitor at the same resolution, and that means smaller text.
And keep in mind that a 27" light source isn't exactly something you want shoved right into your face, so in addition to this small size, I'm sitting a foot away from the screen.
So that's the math on 12pt, which is the default size. Okay.
But sub/superscript is ~0.75em!
Using the same handy guide and this time assuming 9pts (actual size may be a bit less), I come up with 0.117" or 2.98mm.
Do you really think anyone will take an interest in reading something that is barely more than half the size of normal text? I mean, small quantities yes, or if I already think what you're going to say is worth reading, sure. But this principle doesn't apply to even a 500-word vignette, as far as submitted lit goes.
Also, a wonderful quote from pica-ae:
Super- and subscript have a purpose, and it's NOT to write whole paragraphs in them.
The only reason I don't automatically delete all works like this is because I've made a fix for literature deviations. But please think about what this means, especially since it doesn't readjust line height, which leaves anything put through it looking like a high school essay back when teachers used to insist on double-spacing.
- Your design choices are effectively worthless. Yeah, I went there. If this were a website, it'd be a slap on the wrist to the designer: I don't like what you want me to see, so I'm overriding it. (In reality, I skip the site.) It has the classiness level of taunts in the schoolyard, but with the added bonus of saving money on new glasses and headache pills.
- If you think teeny text somehow changes the meaning of your words, making it full-size has got to be embarrassing. If the only reason your text has emotional value is because it's too small for people to read it clearly, here's a friendly protip: THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE FONT SIZE. (I thought about reiterating that in subscript to see if it would click better, but fuck it.)
- Forum posts? You're kidding, right? Yeah, no, I'll bother if it seems like you're saying something interesting. I didn't make a fix for those because it'd be a bitch, and also because any ignoring of your opinion due to the way you've presented it is your own fault. You're okay with taking the responsibility for that, right? Good.
So anyway. I would like to say that as far as font size goes, you're still free to do whatever the hell you want—no need to listen to some cranky old lady with a big hulking monitor. I'm trying to say this, believe me, but it's about as easy as waving my hands and telling people that it's okay to have yellow text on a white background. It is bad design. You are making a bad design decision.
I hope the explanation of what monitor size and screen resolution can do to tiny text helped, for those of you who honestly don't realize how godsawful it is otherwise. Believe me, bitty text doesn't look so bad on my 11" netbook. But I also have adjusted my web browsers to display fonts at the sizes I prefer, and you thinking you know what I want to see better than me isn't going to fly.
So before you dump your whole thing in nonsensically small text, ask yourself one thing.
Am I doing this for myself or for my audience?
Counteropinions are always welcome, but if they're too small to read, I'm not bothering.
Now you know.