Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×

:iconneurotype: More from neurotype


More from deviantART



Details

Submitted on
November 3, 2012
Submitted with
Sta.sh Writer
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
2,783 (2 today)
Favourites
55 (who?)
Comments
318
×

Stop Peeing on DDs

Journal Entry: Sat Nov 3, 2012, 12:46 AM

Rude comments on DDs aren't always about the actual feature.



There's no question that the worst thing you can do on a DD is go on and on about how it didn't deserve it, blah blah blah et cetera. The artist had nothing to do with the decision so go to the FAQs and stop being a little bitch. If you can take the time to whine, you can take a little extra to do it properly. FAQ #873: What do I do when I disapprove of a Daily Deviation feature?

I welcome all concerns addressed directly to me. I expect it, rather.



But anyway, this isn't a rant about that. It's a rant about something more insidious: the attitude that DDs are the only thing worth looking at in the whole fucking category.

I'm not directly quoting anyone, but the following is a sample of stuff I've seen. (This is vaguer and a bit nicer than most of it, I'm not that good at being all down with the pointless hating. But the 'I don't read' comments don't give me warm fuzzies either, y'know?)

I don't normally read lit because it bores me, but this was actually decent.

Wow, something that deserves a feature.

I read this to the end, and I never read lit on dA!

I hope you're noticing a pattern here. All of these people aren't so much complimenting the author as they are putting down the rest of the community and listing the author as an exception to the rule that 'lit sucks.'

I can't speak for how other authors feel about it when they get a comment like that, but my own reaction is something like 'thanks but no thanks.' Like if the only way you can say something nice about my work is to qualify it by pointing out that everything else is extremely bad, I'd rather you faved and ran because agreeing with you makes me sound like a douche, too, and I don't want to say 'thank you' so much as 'maybe you should read more.'



When you say 'I don't like lit, but I didn't hate this' you are turning the author's accomplishment into your own. Regardless of what went through your head when you read it, there is no good reason to phrase your comment like the author has done you a huge favour by posting something that was something you could stand to read, you poor delicate flower.

There are many more appropriate ways to say you liked something. Above all, focus on the art. It's always about the art. 'Awesome work bringing out xxxx and yyyy': just because it's a compliment doesn't mean you have to waver between mindless or derogatory. Say what you specifically liked about it, maybe the dialogue or the concept or the overall execution.

Or, again, don't say anything. Or look at what other people are saying and how the author is responding and adjust your response based on that.

Anyway, as far as I can tell this is a problem unique to literature: the attitude that taking ten minutes out of your day to read something good means you're entitled to bitch about all the stuff you haven't even looked at (no, the front page doesn't count).



This isn't your goddamn castle, and you're not a princess. If you have such a problem with the onsite literature, start a) reading the DDs, b) posting your own work, and c) joining groups where the admins do quality checks before allowing literature submissions to go through (you know what, just watch ScreamPrompts, it's good for you...also CRLiterature because seriously do it now).

Also, I have a pretty swank favourites folder, which probably has a more general appeal than the DD'd folder, but what the fuck. There are no excuses for you to only ever have found one piece of literature on the entire site that you enjoyed.

None.



skin by Infinite705
Another rant, this time about people who think all posted literature sucks and then feel the need to say it on DDs they like.

Yes, I could say this more nicely. You may have noticed the trend of that's not happening, though.

^Thiefoworld has a great journal series on DDs going, so y'all should follow him.

Before anyone asks, the GIFs are respectively from 'Devdas,' '3 Idiots,' and 'Om Shanti Om.' You can hit Esc to stop the animation. :)

Here's a recent slightly edited example, by the way: 'finally, some dA lit worth reading.'
Add a Comment:
 
:iconshadowedacolyte:
I got about 5 of those comments on my most recent lit DD, and yes, it's extremely annoying.

Solution? Direct people to DLD. DLD consistently gathers excellent Lit on dA in one easy place, and for obvious reasons can feature more than just the CV's can do with lit DDs.
Reply
:iconneurotype:
neurotype Dec 14, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Nice!

Yeah, when I get those I'm like 'you know there's a lit DD EVERY SINGLE DAY passive aggressive smiley'.
Reply
:icongillianivy:
GillianIvy Nov 24, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I suppose any assinine comment I may have made of the don't normally read on dA should be prefaced with the reason why... Usually, no time as most of my dA time is spent in my inbox. And also because the whole lack of max-width thing. (I know, you made a fix for that) And I am too lazy to drag the screen. Well, I usually try to leave better comments than just a few words. Which is why I have no time on dA...
Reply
:iconneurotype:
neurotype Nov 25, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Haha, same to the last. I dunno though, I don't think the author you're commenting on needs to hear any of that is all. But it does explain why, for instance, I have a folder of like 200 lit pieces I haven't read yet. :B
Reply
:icongillianivy:
GillianIvy Nov 25, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I read the Doctor Who DD the other day. Which I have to look automatically if it is Doctor Who and DD. There are a lot of them. And yes, I made the "I don't read" comment... but meant I don't have time to read... ;P I said something significant as well. Not just a dur duh durrr remark... :dummy:
Reply
:iconneurotype:
neurotype Nov 25, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
:giggle: This is true, and that's exactly why I looked at it.

I'm still like WHY AREN'T YOU READING MORE, so of course the safe option is not admitting you don't :shifty:
Reply
:icongillianivy:
GillianIvy Nov 26, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I know, there are a lot of people who hate reading, hate books and just are like "derp derp, I don't read! :w00t:". There's groups on Facebook devoted to the dislike of reading. I think my cousin's daughter has that as a Facebook interest... *sigh* Don't kids realize nerds are cool right now? Being intelligent is the 'In' thing.
Reply
:iconneurotype:
neurotype Nov 26, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I don't even. :crazy:
Reply
:icongillianivy:
GillianIvy Nov 26, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
search I hate reading or I hate books on Facebook. More than 100,000 people bothered to type this in. There are a few groups on it. The funny thing is, whoever made the page for it, listed it as a book title for the category. So it suggests books liked by your friends in the more like this section. :XD: Only stupid people hate books.
Reply
:iconneurotype:
neurotype Nov 26, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yeah, I'm not doing that :P
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: